Bauernfängerei with bureaucracy and abuse of data
Köpenickiade About This would be laughable if it were not such a lousy scam. Farmers who get EU subsidies, the year got a demand for payment of Federal Institute for Agriculture and Food (BLE) . Checkout: a mandatory contribution to the legal "climate change compensation fund", payable within 14 days with the attached remittance slip and measured by the resulting EU subsidies .
BLE there, but not the fund and not the law, to which appointed the letter. The letters were a forgery.
The political controversy: The crooks have the data on the amount of subsidies and the addresses of the sites apparently taken from the website, with which the EU wanted to establish transparency beginning of December 2010 on agricultural production. The European Court has ended the practice after German farmers had complained among other things.
The German Farmers 'Association can therefore know today
"This brazen fraud case confirms the German Farmers Association (DBV) and its national farmers' organizations in their tireless Criticism of an excessive transparency of operational data that could only be stopped by the European Court of Justice recently. Professional associations have had with great concern indicated that a publication of payments made with personal details from the hotel - this also accessible via the Internet and everyone - not just create desires and expectations of others, it can be abused especially . This is exactly what has now entered. In the forged letter could the individual farm payment will be specified exactly . Who the misuse of personal and company data to crimes will not open the door, should not be tempted to anyone on providing uncontrolled access. "
for the disclosure of the EU agricultural subsidy payments had NGOs lobbied for years, including the initiative Farmsubsidy .. org
The Background: A large part of EU funding is not at mid-size farmers but to large companies the food industry, Nestlé to Süducker in force up to Campina, of müller milch to Storck, to large- cooperatives and East German LPG successor, but also to energy giants such as RWE, golf clubs, riding schools, railways, hospitals, Lufthansa, sewage treatment plants, banks and large land owners such as Prince Charles. About 40% of farms receive only 8% of the money, but 80% of the money will go to 20% of farms. That has made in recent years for more and more controversy. Thus, the EU gave way and forced transparency. Brussels had committed under the European Transparency Initiative the BLE you to publish the data on the Internet (sample picture to the left of the BLE, special page agro-fisheries-zahlungen.de, now blocked.) The European Court in Luxembourg, the on 9 November 2010 with decisions in the cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 ended.
"On the enabling provision of § 5 para 2 of the Act for the protection of agricultural regions (federal disaster protection act - BHaSchG) was the adoption of the Climate Change Compensation Fund Regulation (KlimaEV) the legal climate Compensation Fund with effect from 01.09.2009 up as unincorporated special federal Liability covers damage caused. to persons and property as well as resulting from damages caused by natural disasters such as floods, droughts, fires, storms and heat waves.it can not, because it is not the HaSchG that KlimaEV not, nor even the KlEF -. Bauernfängerei pure
According to § 5 para 3 BHaSchG all recipients of grants from EU agricultural funds and Fisheries Fund contributions to climate change compensation fund (KlEF) pay. An exemption from this opportunity to pay contributions, the law does not ... "
0 comments:
Post a Comment